Sarah Palin Vogue Cover Was Photoshopped
Sarah Palin was in Vogue but was not on the cover. It’s actually Photoshopped. The picture was created last December by a female blogger from Alaska, before the primaries even began. This swindle is courtesy of AOL’s Parent’s Dish, where the picture was spread.
The real Sarah Palin Vogue Pictures can be found here.
August 29th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
So he’s really gunning for the sour grapes Hilary supporters; maybe he’ll find a bunch of dumb old broads who don’t care about women’s rights because they’re retired and beyond childbearing age to vote for him.
August 29th, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Sorry– you’ve been duped. This was a bogus. Palin was never in Vogue. Nice try, though.
August 29th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
The photo was created by the blogger at thekonkon.com. Go to the site and search for “Vogue” and you will find that the photo was created by the blogger. The blog also shows the real pictures of Palin in Vogue. So it is true she is Vogue but the photo above is a fake.
August 29th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
This was a fun mock-up a person did. Palin never appeared on the actual Vogue cover.
August 29th, 2008 at 7:29 pm
there is no such website “thekonkon.com”
August 29th, 2008 at 11:55 pm
Try looking for Kodiak Konfidential blogspot. When I searched for Sarah Palin Vogue early this afternoon, his blog was the first hit on google. Tonight this pic is plastered everywhere saying it is actually the cover. Love the net sometimes.
August 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am
Try http://www.thekokon.com to see the real pictures of Palin
August 31st, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Was this pic produced by the Obama campaign? This is exactly the kind of thing that happens just because a woman is pretty. How sexist can you get? Whatever happened to honor and truth? Doesn’t exist for the creator of the pic.
I’m a 73 yr old woman and a Hillary supporter, a life long Democrat. I’m voting for John McCain/Sarah Palin.
September 4th, 2008 at 5:00 pm
To the old 73 hag ur a dem but voting 4 mccain y not obama hillary is backing him its because hes black thats the only thing i can thnk of
September 7th, 2008 at 8:25 am
“To the old 73 hag ur a dem but voting 4 mccain y not obama hillary is backing him its because hes black thats the only thing i can thnk of”
liek ya liek totally 4 eva
September 8th, 2008 at 12:25 am
Tommy, You know that there are millions of women of child bearing age that are prolife. They care about the people of the womb and their mothers. No child deserves to be murdered in the womb or out. Murdering ones own child is a horrible thing for a woman to have to try to live with for her whole life. She must bury the memory and have the quilt come in detrimental ways physically and/or psychologically or she must face the fact of what she has done and seek forgiveness and yet she’ll never forget the child she killed. Prolife is prowomen. Though many men find forcing their girl friend to kill their child convenient they also can suffer from the guilt and face it or hide it. Hidden guilt is a silent destroyer.
September 10th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Kathleen, you have been brainwashed. Being pro-life is not automatically pro-women, in fact sometimes a pro-life stance can cripple a woman for her entire life. Imagine your father, uncle or cousin gets you pregnant by raping you. Sarah Palin’s stance is that you carry that child to term. Sure adoption is available to you, but your entire life would be changed and you’ll have a constant reminder of that pain. Childbirth is a wonderful experience when you are bonded with a child you love; it would be utter hell if you birthed a child conceived in hatred and violence, and would destroy the woman forced into it. An embryo is not a life, even within the context of the Bible, and to force a woman to go through all of the emotional, mental and physical pain of carrying an unwanted child to term is in now way empowering to women.
Taking away choices is never pro-anyone.
September 12th, 2008 at 11:28 am
people of the womb
Interesting marketing slogan. Is that more like the “wine of the century” or “trees of the Burpee’s catalog?”
Kinda gives new meaning to “Children of the Corn.”
I find that reasoning via marketing slogans leads to spurious results. But, you know, if you lack a head then follow your heart.
September 13th, 2008 at 9:58 pm
Just to clarify, Sarah Palin was indeed in Vogue. She appears inside the February 2008 issue. It’s definitely NOT a cover. It’s just an inside story. Plus, the pictures of her are so small, you can barely see her face.
Supporting your favorite politician is fine, but stop exaggerating, in the same way that Sarah Palin is repeatedly over-stating her own achievements in politics.
September 16th, 2008 at 9:49 pm
That picture looks very photoshopped (and it is).
-Autumn
September 19th, 2008 at 11:03 pm
To the 73 year old Clinton nee McCain supporter. If voting for a man who was 6th from the bottom of his class, who divorced and left his first swimsuit model wife for the beer heiress because she “got fat” after busting some bones in a car accident, who voted with GWB (read Great White Bigot) 90% of the time, who has been in Washington for a quarter-century and resided over the politics that have the market in free-fall, people’s retirement funds made worthless, and homes sitting at a third of their original value, who in the 10 opportunities he had to support the troops by offering them aid, body-armor, leave time equal to combat time, or at the very least a decent place to recover from injury voted AGAINST them, I say this: The Republicans will NEVER repeal Roe vs. Wade because it will guarantee that idiots like you will continue to vote against your best interest. PLEASE WAKE UP or STAY HOME.
September 27th, 2008 at 10:28 am
To the “Pro-Life” Group. First let me say that I am Pro-Life. I was raised a Catholic and come from a family who votes for a Presidential Candidate soley one his stance on abortion. If you are one of these people, I suspect Kathleen is one of them, you need to take off your narrow viewing glasses and look at the big picture. You need to go under the assumption that Roe v. Wade will never be overturned. If you are pro-life, then you should be caring about all life! What about the lives of the children that are born? The Republicans don’t want to educate them, provide healthcare, or any other social programs that enrich their lives. They will send them to war for the benefit of oil and if they live to return home, they will let them die in the streets. Reagan kicked them all out of the mental facilities. Social Security is a mess, if people live long enough to get there (seeing how bad the healthcare system is). Finally, our children are not living in a safe America due to the financial and economic state of affairs. Economic strife is the “life” that our children will lead. Struggle to put food on the table, struggle to pay for the necessities. They can’t afford healthcare. They don’t have proper education to help them get jobs to sustain. Our girls won’t get equal pay.
In short, if you think you are being “Pro-Life” by voting Rebulican, you are sadly short-sided. If you can’t vote to get our country back on track by voting for Barack Obama, and your “ideals” won’t let you, then just stay home on election day. You can then ease your conscience. Let the rest of us who see the big picture take care of you and your children.
October 2nd, 2008 at 8:53 am
In just a few words, it can be said that Sarah (I love to talk about myself) Palin is grossly overrated and over marketed. And JM found another woman he can put his arm around. They are both clueless about the economy.